The most common way that palliative care practitioners assess symptom control is with a structured questionnaire that includes rating various symptoms on a scale of 0 to 10. The scale most commonly used in Canada is the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale, or ESAS.
Â
Why I'm not a fan of the ESASWhy I'm not a fan of the ESAS
The ESAS is a simple tool, but patients universally dislike completing it, for many reasons:
- Symptoms are hard to quantify in a numerical scale
- Some of the symptoms are vague and broad
- Symptoms change through the course of the day and are dependent on activity and other factors
Â
I personally have some issues with it as well:
- Every patient has their own internal scale, so a rating of, for example, 4/10 for pain could mean very different things to different patients. The ESAS never really answers the questions I need to be answered, which are things like âHow are your symptoms affecting you?â And âHow tolerable are your symptoms right now?â
- The scale starts from zero, which seems to set zero as a goal for symptom control. This is an unrealistic goal for many patients, and anchors them to that goal.
- The ESAS, and other numerical symptom rating scales, do not give me the information I need in order to know âdo I need to act on this?â
Â
Finally, at least one study has shown that almost 1 in 5 people who rate their pain as 4-6/10 on a numerical scale actually feel their pain is intolerable, and almost half of people who rate their pain as 7-10/10 actually feel their pain is tolerable.
My overall impression is that numerical pain and symptom scales are not an efficient way of assessing patientsâ symptom control. They may be helpful in statistical analysis of research studies, but without better contextual information, the performance of âdoing an ESASâ may actually distract from more relevant symptom assessment in clinical practice.
Â